<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should you go 64 bit or stick with 32 bit Windows Vista?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/</link>
	<description>Reviews, news, tutorials, gaming, web, gadgets, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd webb</title>
		<link>http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>jd webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordplop.com/?p=22#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>Great read, thanks for putting it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great read, thanks for putting it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordplop.com/?p=22#comment-554</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried both and must say 64-Bit runs noticeably smoother on my PC with Dual Core + 2GB Ram, probably a lot better if I had 4GB Ram. 

But I&#039;ll be sticking to 32-Bit for a while, until most if not all my apps are released in their 64-Bit variants.

Won&#039;t be long though until the 64-Bit conversion starts with the release of Windows 7, more and more apps will be running native in 64-Bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried both and must say 64-Bit runs noticeably smoother on my PC with Dual Core + 2GB Ram, probably a lot better if I had 4GB Ram. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll be sticking to 32-Bit for a while, until most if not all my apps are released in their 64-Bit variants.</p>
<p>Won&#8217;t be long though until the 64-Bit conversion starts with the release of Windows 7, more and more apps will be running native in 64-Bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPlop</title>
		<link>http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPlop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordplop.com/?p=22#comment-448</guid>
		<description>What a creative comment. Are you running it on 128 megs of ram?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a creative comment. Are you running it on 128 megs of ram?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RSSaid</title>
		<link>http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>RSSaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordplop.com/?p=22#comment-447</guid>
		<description>Windows Vista is sux</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Vista is sux</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPlop</title>
		<link>http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPlop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordplop.com/?p=22#comment-254</guid>
		<description>/facepalm.

Adobe what? Flash? Photoshop?
Youtube needs flash. You need to install that from adobe&#039;s site, and if you do, it works.
It runs every single game I have thrown at it. Again, you obviously just don&#039;t know how to install them right, or most likely your games are pirated and the cracks don&#039;t work.

See, it&#039;s people like this that bring Vista a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/facepalm.</p>
<p>Adobe what? Flash? Photoshop?<br />
Youtube needs flash. You need to install that from adobe&#8217;s site, and if you do, it works.<br />
It runs every single game I have thrown at it. Again, you obviously just don&#8217;t know how to install them right, or most likely your games are pirated and the cracks don&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>See, it&#8217;s people like this that bring Vista a bad name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blake</title>
		<link>http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordplop.com/?p=22#comment-253</guid>
		<description>do not buy this vista 64 garbage
not even adobe will install
will not play utube
will not run 95 % of games</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do not buy this vista 64 garbage<br />
not even adobe will install<br />
will not play utube<br />
will not run 95 % of games</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcom</title>
		<link>http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordplop.com/?p=22#comment-132</guid>
		<description>This website is Great! I will recommend you to all my friends. I found so much useful things here. Thank you.m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This website is Great! I will recommend you to all my friends. I found so much useful things here. Thank you.m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xp/vista directx9/10</title>
		<link>http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>xp/vista directx9/10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordplop.com/?p=22#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] Vista but i don&#039;t recommend installing a 64-bit system because of compatibility issues. Read this: WordPlop - Should you go 64 bit or stick with 32 bit Windows Vista?     [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vista but i don&#8217;t recommend installing a 64-bit system because of compatibility issues. Read this: WordPlop &#8211; Should you go 64 bit or stick with 32 bit Windows Vista?     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPlop - Why some people hate Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPlop - Why some people hate Vista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordplop.com/?p=22#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] year old video camera, you shouldn&#8217;t expect them to work out-the-box with Vista. As I said in this post, you need to check the hardware manufacturer&#8217;s website to make sure your hardware is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year old video camera, you shouldn&#8217;t expect them to work out-the-box with Vista. As I said in this post, you need to check the hardware manufacturer&#8217;s website to make sure your hardware is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Donner</title>
		<link>http://www.wordplop.com/2008/03/27/should-you-go-64-bit-or-stick-with-32-bit-windows-vista/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Donner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordplop.com/?p=22#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Vista X64 SP1 with an E6600 4GB with tons of hardware and 55+ programs (not games, very computer techy oriented stuff) and it runs like helll, stable, smooth.

I&#039;m not ashamed as systemadmin since &#039;87 to admit that this is the best Windows OS ever, not so much on the outside, but on the inside. I wasn&#039;t fond of Vista x86, but Vista X64 is very good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Vista X64 SP1 with an E6600 4GB with tons of hardware and 55+ programs (not games, very computer techy oriented stuff) and it runs like helll, stable, smooth.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not ashamed as systemadmin since &#8217;87 to admit that this is the best Windows OS ever, not so much on the outside, but on the inside. I wasn&#8217;t fond of Vista x86, but Vista X64 is very good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

